exercise

You are currently browsing articles tagged exercise.

Barbells; image from Office.comIt’s been weeks since I went to the gym. Every day, I think, “Tomorrow’s going to be the day.” But not yet…

In the meantime, my poetry muscles need a workout, too.

Today’s exercise:

Look around, or if you’re walking to work or the bus or a bakery, keep a close eye on the little details. Choose one concrete thing–on the sidewalk or in the grass or hanging from a tree limb. Start your writing from it, and see how fast you can jump from it and where you can go.

I always think everything around me is ordinary, so this is a good workout for moving past the surface and connecting with associations. I hope.

Facebook Twitter Email

Tags: , ,

Weights for pumping iron

This is how one of my sons exercises.

We all get into habits, ruts, crutches. Today’s two: “of” and “is.”

Without writing of

A while back, Anne Pitkin helped me by pointing out one of mine: a tendency to say _____ of _____.

It isn’t that you can’t say that, but it’s easy (for me, anyway) to get into a rut and suddenly find my poem peppered with those “of” statements. And it’s even more dangerous when one or more abstractions are involved. “The intention of annihilation” might sound intriguing, but I think it’s going to get heavy fast.

So today’s first exercise: Write a poem without using the word “of”–anywhere. Or look at an existing poem and circle all instances of “of,” and then replace them.

At this point, you might be thinking that I have one of those small minds that’s haunted by consistency and other petty issues. You’re probably right. (I also tend to follow extreme rules about breaking a line with a word like “of,” although it’s been pointed out to me that other poets have done this brilliantly.)

Let verbs do some heavy lifting

The next common crutch and pet peeve: “There is…”

Again, it isn’t that you can’t use it or shouldn’t use it and that it isn’t beautifully used sometimes by someone. But really, we have stronger verbs. In fact, a friend pointed out that Finnish doesn’t even have a verb for “to be.”

Today’s second exercise: Write a poem without using any is/are/was/were–or take an existing poem, circle those pesky “to be” conjugations, and think of all the other verbs you might use.

Do these exercises change your poem, change your writing? Do they lead you to new images?

Let me know how it works for you. And I’m curious: Do you have any pet peeves or hobgoblins?

Also, I’ve been tinkering again with comments–trying to get them to work without getting hundreds of spam comments. If you have time to test leaving a comment, I greatly appreciate it.

And Happy September!

Facebook Twitter Email

Tags: , ,

Adjectives, adverbs, and abstractions. Sure, they’re helpful when we’re trying to describe a house or a tree or the way we felt after an argument.

But they’re dangerous–so easy to overdo.

I think of adjectives as accessories, along with the advice to “take one thing off.” They can compress, but they might not be as specific as an image. Think of an old house. Think of a house with paint peeling from the window sills. The second example is longer, but it’s also more visual. Think about why the house being old is important.

Adverbs, for me, are a little easier–where there’s an adverb, there’s likely another verb lurking, with more punch to pack. Verbs add momentum and power. The verbs you don’t expect can make a poem sing, steal a reader’s breath away.

Abstractions can sneak into your poem. The easy ones are words like happiness, inspiration, redemption. They’re fine words, but you can’t see them.

Could you replace those words with an image you can see or hear or smell or touch or taste?

And the tricky ones are words like dream. A dream you had last night feels concrete enough, so you think you’re safe–but then those dreams of being famous slip in. Harder to see, ripe for an image.

Recently I received a rejection letter, noting the poem that seemed to come closest still seemed like it needed spicier language. Hmmm… When I looked at the poem, I saw that word dream and thought maybe I needed an image instead.

Exercise

Try it. Pick up a poem that’s been giving you trouble. Cross out all the adjectives and adverbs. Circle all the nouns and verbs they modified. Circle the abstractions. What new verbs and images can you find? How does it change your poem?

Just for fun

Kill the Adjectives
from an NPR report, March 12, 2004

The movement would have you remove them.
Spokesmen speak nothing of adverbs,
posit only that adjectives are too many,
an embarrassment, a waste of riches,
and must be cut by the careless
or by the neophyte. If you won’t use them,
you’re allowed to try. If you string them
together like beads, in phrases of two or three,
you have over-accessorized.
(Take one modifier off.)
They expect only experts
to describe with qualifiers,
craft sentences with discernment,
and balance their weight in verbs.

Originally published in Plainsongs.

Adjectives, adverbs, and abstractions. Sure, they’re helpful when we’re trying to describe a house or a tree or the way we felt after an argument.

But they’re dangerous–so easy to overdo.

I think of adjectives as accessories, along with the advice to “take one thing off.” They can compress, but they might not be as specific as an image. Think of an old house. Think of a house with paint peeling from the window sills. The second example is longer, but it’s also more visual. Think about why the house being old is important.

Adverbs, for me, are a little easier–where there’s an adverb, there’s likely another verb lurking, with more punch to pack. Verbs add momentum and power. The verbs you don’t expect can make a poem sing, steal a reader’s breath away.

Abstractions are sneaky nouns. The easy ones are words like happiness, inspiration, redemption. They’re fine words, but you can’t see them.

Could you replace those words with an image you can see or hear or smell or touch or taste?

And the tricky ones are words like dream. A dream you had last night feels more concrete than dreams of being famous.

Recently I received a rejection letter, noting the poem that seemed to come closest still seemed like it needed spicier language. Hmmm… When I looked at the poem, I saw that word dream and thought maybe I needed an image instead.

Exercise

Try it. Pick up a poem that’s been giving you trouble. Cross out all the adjectives and adverbs. Circle all the nouns and verbs they modified. Circle the abstractions. What new verbs and images can you find? How does it change your poem?

Just for fun

Kill the Adjectives

from an NPR report, March 12, 2004

The movement would have you remove them.

Spokesmen speak nothing of adverbs,

posit only that adjectives are too many,

an embarrassment, a waste of riches,

and must be cut by the careless

or by the neophyte. If you won’t use them,

you’re allowed to try. If you string them

together like beads, in phrases of two or three,

you have over-accessorized.

(Take one modifier off.)

They expect only experts

to describe with qualifiers,

craft sentences with discernment,

and balance their weight in verbs.

Originally published in Plainsongs.

Facebook Twitter Email

Tags: , ,


A new year, new resolutions.

I love resolutions. I make them at the solstices, the equinoxes, the beginning of the school year—but New Year’s Day is the big day for trying to mend, amend, atone, and generally plan improvements.

In the coming year, I want to exercise more and ride my bike more—which requires getting on my bike (it’s still dark, it’s still cold out).

I also want to exercise my poetry muscles more, or more deeply.

Over the past few days, I’ve been trying to figure out how.

I thought about trying to take a picture every day and then write about the picture.

I thought about trying to write about food again—hey, I could take a picture of food every day and write about that.

Not bad ideas. Good ways to keep writing. But ultimately, they sound too prescriptive or restrictive—even a bit like busywork.

Then I thought about trying to get to the heart of the poem, each and every poem. How do you do that?

In the past, I’ve tried setting minimums, saying that each poem should go through at least five revision passes. But those were mostly my tweaky little revisions.

So I thought that maybe I should try at least Five Big Things with each poem. Big Things like taking each stanza and writing a new poem or finding the trap doors and writing from each of them or distilling the poem to its central image and writing a new poem about it every day for ten days (see, these really do sound like exercises—and is that a good thing?) or cutting the poem into separate phrases and playing around with rearranging them or … I’ve made it up to four.

I’m taken with that notion, and maybe Three Big Things are enough of a start. And some poems seem kind of just done without all of that. But are they?

How do you know when a poem is done? How do you know when you’ve reached the heart of it?

Facebook Twitter Email

Tags: , , ,

Today’s

Winter comes to rest
The darkest nights of the year
A few clouds, few stars

Facebook Twitter Email

Tags: ,

« Older entries